A First Pass at a “Get It In / Track It Down” Graphic
Source: Mike Caulfield Substack
Author: Mike Caulfield
Original source: https://mikecaulfield.substack.com/p/a-first-pass-at-a-get-it-in-track
Source type: guide
Private backup: the full article text is archived in the private repository at archives/articles/mikecaulfield-substack-com-a-first-pass-at-a-get-it-in-track.source.md. It is not published on the public Quartz site.
Summary
Mike Caulfield shares draft visuals for an emerging “three AI moves” framework, including “Get it in” and “Track it down.” The post is intentionally lightweight: a process artifact released early so educators can adapt, improve, and operationalize the framework in practice. Its importance is less the finished graphic than the design principle that AI literacy needs simple, teachable actions that can circulate through classrooms.
Big ideas
- Students need to check AI answers against real evidence
- Students need to bring the purpose; AI should not supply it for them
Claims
- Research prompts can support inquiry without taking over student judgment
- AI literacy should teach students what to do with AI, not just what to think about it
Key evidence and examples
- Caulfield says he built two draft infographics manually in Canva.
- The visuals are connected to a compact “three AI moves” framework.
- He compares the release strategy to SIFT, where educators eventually created stronger graphics than the original creator.
- Publishing a rough starting point is presented as “half the battle.”
- The post notes that a fuller explanation of why these moves matter is still forthcoming.
Pull quotes
A starting visual
I built two infographics (in Canva by hand, in case you’re wondering) for the three AI moves.
Starting point first
Maybe the same is true here and just getting a starting point out is half the battle:
More explanation coming
I’m also working on something that talks about “why these three things” — it’s just taking longer than I though it would to get it out.
Education relevance
This is relevant to AI literacy curriculum design and professional learning because it shows the value of classroom-facing routines, posters, and simple moves over exhaustive checklists.
Durability note
This is a lightweight resource post, so its details are less durable than the broader Get It In / Track It Down pattern; its lasting value is as a snapshot of early pedagogy and visual language around the three AI moves.